Nmap Security Scanner Ref Guide Security Lists Security Tools Site News Advertising About/Contact Credits Sponsors |
Nmap Development: Re: [PATCH] new --min-retries options # Re: [PATCH] new --min-retries options This message: [ Message body ] [ More options ] Related messages: [ Next message ] [ Previous message ] [ In reply to ] [ Next in thread ] [ Replies ] On Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 10:14:10PM -0500, Jon Passki wrote: > Hello All, > > Today I was scanning using an unreliable network (shared wireless) > and had some packet loss. I had root access to the host I was > scanning, which allowed me to review the firewall logs and run a > tcpdump of the traffic. There was 2% to 20% packet loss, depending > upon --max-parallelism and --min-parallelism settings. The host had > two ports open and four ports closed, will all the others filtered. > Even with what seemed the default two retransmissions there still was > loss. Did you get wrong results with the default Nmap timing behavior, or had you also specified aggressive timing options such as --min-parallelism when this happened? Cheers, -F _______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Received on Jul 06 2006 This message: [ Message body ] Next message: majek04: "[patch] support for ip options" Previous message: Fyodor: "Re: [Patch] Re: NMAP XML reports unreadable in linux" In reply to: Jon Passki: "[PATCH] new --min-retries options" Next in thread: Jon Passki: "Re: [PATCH] new --min-retries options" Reply: Jon Passki: "Re: [PATCH] new --min-retries options" Reply: Jon Passki: "Re: [PATCH] new --min-retries options" Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]
| [ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]